\documentclass[11 pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,amsfonts,amssymb,titlesec} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{verbatim} \usepackage{accents} \usepackage[citestyle=alphabetic,bibstyle=alphabetic,backend=bibtex]{biblatex} \usepackage{todonotes} \usepackage[american]{babel} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \hypersetup{colorlinks=false} \usetikzlibrary{calc, decorations.pathreplacing,shapes.misc} \usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing} \usepackage[left=1in,top=1in,right=1in]{geometry} \usepackage[capitalize]{cleveref} \newcommand{\mathcolorbox}[2]{\colorbox{#1}{$\displaystyle #2$}} \newcommand{\xxx}{T base with combinatorial potential data } \newcommand{\Xxx}{T base with combinatorial potential data } \newcommand{\xxxc}{combinatorial potential stratified space } \newcommand{\Xxxc}{combinatorial potential stratified space } \newcommand{\argument}{symplectic character } \newcommand{\arguments}{symplectic characters } \newcommand{\snip}[2]{#1} \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section] \newtheorem{lem}[theorem]{Lemma} \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma} \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition} \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary} \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture} \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation} \newtheorem{question}[theorem]{Question} \theoremstyle{remark} \newtheorem{rem}[theorem]{Remark} \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark} \crefname{rem}{Remark}{Remarks} \Crefname{rem}{Remark}{Remarks} \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise} \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example} \newenvironment{construction}{}{} \newenvironment{exposition}{}{} \newenvironment{application}{}{} \theoremstyle{definition} \newtheorem{df}[theorem]{Definition} \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition} \titleformat*{\section}{\normalsize \bfseries \filcenter} \titleformat*{\subsection}{\normalsize \bfseries } \newtheorem{mainthm}{Theorem} \Crefname{mainthm}{Theorem}{Theorems} \newtheorem{maincor}[mainthm]{Corollary} \Crefname{maincor}{Corollary}{Corollaries} \renewcommand*{\themainthm}{\Alph{mainthm}} \makeatletter \def\namedlabel#1#2{\begingroup \def\@currentlabel{#2}% \label{#1}\endgroup } \makeatother \fancypagestyle{firstpage}{% \fancyhf{} \renewcommand\headrulewidth{0pt} \fancyfoot[R]{Original text at \texttt{ \href{http://jeffhicks.net/snippets/index.php?tag=art_constructingMirrors}{snippets/art\_constructingMirrors}}} } \newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde} \newcommand{\wh}{\widehat} \newcommand{\wb}{\overline} \newcommand{\bb}{\mathbb} \newcommand{\scr}{\mathscr} \newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb R} \newcommand{\ZZ}{\mathbb Z} \newcommand{\QQ}{\mathbb Q} \newcommand{\CC}{\mathbb C} \newcommand{\TT}{\mathbb T} \newcommand{\NN}{\mathbb N} \newcommand{\PP}{\mathbb P} \newcommand{\LL}{\mathbb L} \newcommand{\II}{\mathbb I} \newcommand{\CP}{\mathbb{CP}} \newcommand{\del}{\nabla} \newcommand{\pp}{\mathbf{m}} \newcommand{\into}{\hookrightarrow} \newcommand{\emprod}{m} \newcommand{\tensor}{\otimes} \renewcommand{\Re}{\text{Re}} \renewcommand{\Im}{\text{Im}} \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\CF}{CF^\bullet} \newcommand{\HF}{HF^\bullet} \newcommand{\SH}{SH^\bullet} \newcommand{\core}{\mathfrak{c}} \newcommand{\cocore}{\mathfrak{u}} \newcommand{\stp}{\mathfrak{f}} \newcommand{\li}{i} \newcommand{\ot}{\leftarrow} \newcommand{\Spinc}{\text{Spin}^c} \newcommand{\ev}{ev} \newcommand{\st}{\;:\;} \newcommand{\OP}{\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}} \newcommand{\OPP}{\mathcal O_{\mathbb P\times \mathbb P}} \newcommand{\gentime}{\text{\ClockLogo}} \newcommand{\q}{m} \newcommand{\HeF}{\widehat{CF}^\bullet} \newcommand{\HHeF}{\widehat{HF}^\bullet} \newcommand{\p}{\eta} \DeclareMathOperator{\id}{id} \DeclareMathOperator{\cone}{cone} \DeclareMathOperator{\dg}{dg} \DeclareMathOperator{\Hom}{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator{\Log}{Log} \DeclareMathOperator{\Conn}{Conn} \DeclareMathOperator{\Sym}{Sym} \DeclareMathOperator{\Flux}{Flux} \DeclareMathOperator{\Crit}{Crit} \DeclareMathOperator{\ind}{ind} \DeclareMathOperator{\codim}{codim} \DeclareMathOperator{\sgn}{sgn} \DeclareMathOperator{\Ext}{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator{\TropB}{TropB} \DeclareMathOperator{\weight}{wt} \DeclareMathOperator{\Span}{span} \DeclareMathOperator{\Coh}{Coh} \DeclareMathOperator{\Pic}{Pic} \DeclareMathOperator{\Fuk}{Fuk} \DeclareMathOperator{\str}{star} \DeclareMathOperator{\Ob}{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator{\Coh}{Coh} \DeclareMathOperator{\CritVal}{CritV} \DeclareMathOperator{\Sing}{Sing} \DeclareMathOperator{\FS}{FS} \DeclareMathOperator{\Vect}{Vect} \DeclareMathOperator{\grad}{grad} \DeclareMathOperator{\Supp}{Supp} \DeclareMathOperator{\Bl}{Bl} \DeclareMathOperator{\Spec}{Spec} \DeclareMathOperator{\Tw}{Tw} \DeclareMathOperator{\Int}{Int} \DeclareMathOperator{\Arg}{\mathbf{M}} \begin{filecontents}{references.bib} @article{ballard2012hochschild, title={Hochschild dimensions of tilting objects}, author={Ballard, Matthew and Favero, David}, journal={International Mathematics Research Notices}, volume={2012}, number={11}, pages={2607--2645}, year={2012}, publisher={OUP} } @article{craw2007explicit, title={Explicit methods for derived categories of sheaves}, author={Craw, Alastair}, publisher={Citeseer} } @article{weinstein1971symplectic, title={Symplectic manifolds and their {L}agrangian submanifolds}, author={Weinstein, Alan}, journal={Advances in Mathematics}, volume={6}, number={3}, pages={329--346}, year={1971}, publisher={Academic Press} } @article{hanlon2022aspects, title={Aspects of functoriality in homological mirror symmetry for toric varieties}, author={Hanlon, A and Hicks, J}, journal={Advances in Mathematics}, volume={401}, pages={108317}, year={2022}, publisher={Elsevier} } @article{biran2013lagrangian, title={{L}agrangian cobordism. {I}}, author={Biran, Paul and Cornea, Octav}, journal={Journal of the American Mathematical Society}, volume={26}, number={2}, pages={295--340}, year={2013} } @article{tanaka2016fukaya, title={The Fukaya category pairs with Lagrangian cobordisms}, author={Tanaka, Hiro Lee}, journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04976}, year={2016} } @book{seidel2008fukaya, title={Fukaya categories and Picard-Lefschetz theory}, author={Seidel, Paul}, volume={10}, year={2008}, publisher={European Mathematical Society} } @article{seidel2003long, title={A long exact sequence for symplectic {F}loer cohomology}, author={Seidel, Paul}, journal={Topology}, volume={42}, pages={1003--1063}, year={2003} } @article{da2001lectures, title={Lectures on symplectic geometry}, author={da Silva, Ana Cannas}, journal={Lecture Notes in Mathematics}, volume={1764}, year={2001}, publisher={Springer} } @inproceedings{seidel2001vanishing, title={Vanishing cycles and mutation}, author={Seidel, Paul}, booktitle={European Congress of Mathematics: Barcelona, July 10--14, 2000 Volume II}, pages={65--85}, year={2001}, organization={Springer} } @article{seidel2001more, title={More about vanishing cycles and mutation}, author={Seidel, Paul}, journal={Symplectic Geometry and Mirror Symmetry (Seoul, 2000)}, pages={429--465}, year={2001} } @article{polterovich1991surgery, title={The surgery of {L}agrange submanifolds}, author={Polterovich, Leonid}, journal={Geometric \& Functional Analysis GAFA}, volume={1}, number={2}, pages={198--210}, year={1991}, publisher={Springer} } @misc{perutz2008handleslide, doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.0801.0564}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0564}, author = {Perutz, Timothy}, keywords = {Symplectic Geometry (math.SG), Geometric Topology (math.GT), FOS: Mathematics, FOS: Mathematics, 53D12; 53D40; 57M27; 32U40}, title = {Hamiltonian handleslides for {H}eegaard {F}loer homology}, publisher = {arXiv}, year = {2008}, copyright = {Assumed arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license to distribute this article for submissions made before January 2004} } @incollection{audin1994symplectic, title={Symplectic rigidity: {L}agrangian submanifolds}, author={Audin, Mich{\`e}le and Lalonde, Fran{\c{c}}ois and Polterovich, Leonid}, booktitle={Holomorphic curves in symplectic geometry}, pages={271--321}, year={1994}, publisher={Springer} } @phdthesis{oancea2003suite, title={La suite spectrale de {L}eray-{S}erre en homologie de {F}loer des vari{\'e}t{\'e}s symplectiques compactes {\`a} bord de type contact}, author={Oancea, Alexandru}, year={2003}, school={Universit{\'e} Paris Sud-Paris XI} } @article{abouzaid2010geometric, title={A geometric criterion for generating the {F}ukaya category}, author={Abouzaid, Mohammed}, journal={Publications Math{\'e}matiques de l'IH{\'E}S}, volume={112}, pages={191--240}, year={2010} } @article{viterbo1999functors, title={Functors and computations in {F}loer homology with applications, I}, author={Viterbo, Claude}, journal={Geometric \& Functional Analysis GAFA}, volume={9}, number={5}, pages={985--1033}, year={1999}, publisher={Springer} } @misc{stacks-project, author = {The {Stacks project authors}}, title = {The Stacks project}, howpublished = {\url{https://stacks.math.columbia.edu}}, year = {2022}, } @article{wendlbeginner, title={A beginner’s overview of symplectic homology}, author={Wendl, Chris}, journal={Preprint. www. mathematik. hu-berlin. de/wendl/pub/SH. pdf} } @article{seidel2006biased, title={A biased view of symplectic cohomology}, author={Seidel, Paul}, journal={Current developments in mathematics}, volume={2006}, number={1}, pages={211--254}, year={2006}, publisher={International Press of Boston} } @article{arnol1980lagrange, title={{L}agrange and {L}egendre cobordisms. I}, author={Arnol'd, Vladimir Igorevich}, journal={Funktsional'nyi Analiz i ego Prilozheniya}, volume={14}, number={3}, pages={1--13}, year={1980}, publisher={Russian Academy of Sciences} } @article{fukaya2007lagrangian, title={{L}agrangian intersection {F}loer theory-anomaly and obstruction, chapter 10}, author={Fukaya, K and Oh, YG and Ohta, H and Ono, K}, journal={Preprint, can be found at http://www. math. kyoto-u. ac. jp/\~{} fukaya/Chapter10071117. pdf}, year={2007} } @article{biran2014lagrangian, title={Lagrangian cobordism and Fukaya categories}, author={Biran, Paul and Cornea, Octav}, journal={Geometric and functional analysis}, volume={24}, number={6}, pages={1731--1830}, year={2014}, publisher={Springer} } @article{bourgeois2009symplectic, title={Symplectic homology, autonomous {H}amiltonians, and {M}orse-{B}ott moduli spaces}, author={Bourgeois, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Oancea, Alexandru}, journal={Duke mathematical journal}, volume={146}, number={1}, pages={71--174}, year={2009}, publisher={Duke University Press} } @incollection{auroux2014beginner, title={A beginner’s introduction to {F}ukaya categories}, author={Auroux, Denis}, booktitle={Contact and symplectic topology}, pages={85--136}, year={2014}, publisher={Springer} } @article{singer1933three, title={Three-dimensional manifolds and their {H}eegaard diagrams}, author={Singer, James}, journal={Transactions of the American Mathematical Society}, volume={35}, number={1}, pages={88--111}, year={1933}, publisher={JSTOR} } @article{ozsvath2004holomorphic, title={Holomorphic disks and three-manifold invariants: properties and applications}, author={Ozsv{\'a}th, Peter and Szab{\'o}, Zolt{\'a}n}, journal={Annals of Mathematics}, pages={1159--1245}, year={2004}, publisher={JSTOR} } @article{ozsvath2004introduction, title={An introduction to {H}eegaard {F}loer homology}, author={Ozsv{\'a}th, Peter and Szab{\'o}, Zolt{\'a}n}, journal={{F}loer homology, gauge theory, and low-dimensional topology}, volume={5}, pages={3--27}, year={2004} } @article{fet1952variational, title={Variational problems on closed manifolds}, author={Fet, Abram Il'ich}, journal={Matematicheskii Sbornik}, volume={72}, number={2}, pages={271--316}, year={1952}, publisher={Russian Academy of Sciences, Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian~…} } @article{candelas1991pair, title={A pair of {Calabi--Yau} manifolds as an exactly soluble superconformal theory}, author={Candelas, Philip and de la Ossa, Xenia C. and Green, Paul S. and Parkes, Linda}, journal={Nuclear Physics B}, volume={359}, number={1}, pages={21--74}, year={1991} } @inproceedings{kontsevich1994homological, title={Homological algebra of mirror symmetry}, author={Kontsevich, Maxim}, booktitle={Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians}, year={1994} } @article{strominger1996mirror, title={Mirror symmetry is {T}-duality}, author={Strominger, Andrew and Yau, Shing-Tung and Zaslow, Eric}, journal={Nuclear Physics B}, volume={479}, number={1--2}, pages={243--259}, year={1996}, publisher={Elsevier} } @article{gross2003affine, title={Affine manifolds, log structures, and mirror symmetry}, author={Gross, Mark and Siebert, Bernd}, journal={Turkish Journal of Mathematics}, volume={27}, number={1}, pages={33--60}, year={2003} } @book{hubsch1992calabi, title={{Calabi--Yau} manifolds: A bestiary for physicists}, author={H{\"u}bsch, Tristan}, year={1992}, publisher={World Scientific} } @article{yau1978ricci, title={On the Ricci curvature of a compact {K{\"a}hler} manifold and the complex {Monge--Ampere} equation, I}, author={Yau, Shing-Tung}, journal={Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics}, volume={31}, number={3}, pages={339--411}, year={1978} } @article{gross2001special, title={Special {Lagrangian} fibrations I: Topology}, author={Gross, Mark}, journal={AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics}, volume={23}, pages={65--94}, year={2001} } \end{filecontents} \addbibresource{references.bib}\begin{document} \title{constructing mirrors} \maketitle \thispagestyle{firstpage}The first examples of mirror symmetry involved Calabi--Yau hypersurfaces in projective space. Let $H\subset \CP^n$ be a smooth hypersurface of degree $d$, so $H$ has complex dimension $n-1$. We can compute its first Chern class using the exact sequence \[ 0 \to T^{1,0}H\to T^{1,0}\CP^n|_H\to N_{H/\CP^n}\to 0. \] This tells us that \[ c(T\CP^n)|_H=c(TH)\cdot c(N_{H/\CP^n}). \] Suppose that the hypersurface has degree $d$, and let $h=c_1(\mathcal O_{\CP^n}(1))|_H$. Then \[ c(T\CP^n)|_H=(1+h)^{n+1},\qquad c(N_{H/\CP^n})=1+dh. \] Therefore, \[ 1+(n+1)h+\cdots=(1+c_1(TH)+\cdots)(1+dh), \] so \[ c_1(TH)=(n+1-d)h. \] Equivalently, by adjunction, \[ K_H\simeq \mathcal O_H(d-n-1). \] Thus $d=n+1$ is necessary and sufficient for $H$ to have trivial canonical bundle. If $H$ is smooth, a degree $n+1$ hypersurface in $\CP^n$ is a compact K\"ahler manifold with trivial canonical bundle, hence is Calabi--Yau in the sense of \cref{def:calabiYauManifold}. The quintic threefold in $\CP^4$ is the standard example. \begin{definition}\cite{Mirror symmetry motivation notes} \label{def:largeComplexStructureLimit} Let \[ \pi:\mathcal X^*\to \Delta^* \] be a one-parameter family of Calabi--Yau $n$-folds over a punctured disc. Parallel transport around the puncture gives a monodromy operator \[ T:H^n(X_t;\QQ)\to H^n(X_t;\QQ). \] After replacing the punctured disc by a finite cover if necessary, assume that the monodromy is unipotent, and write $T$ for this unipotent monodromy. Then one can define \[ N:=\log T=(T-I)-\frac{(T-I)^2}{2}+\frac{(T-I)^3}{3}-\cdots . \] The series is finite because $T-I$ is nilpotent. In this introductory convention, a boundary point $t=0$ is called a \emph{large complex-structure limit}, or a \emph{maximally unipotent monodromy point}, if \[ N^n\neq 0 \] on $H^n(X_t;\QQ)$. Equivalently, $N$ has nilpotency index $n+1$, the maximum possible for a weight-$n$ variation of Hodge structure. More refined definitions also impose conditions on the limiting mixed Hodge structure; the maximally unipotent monodromy criterion is the part used in this introductory discussion. \end{definition} For the degree $n+1$ hypersurface family, there is a particularly degenerate limit to the union of the $n+1$ coordinate hyperplanes. The central fiber is a singular toric normal-crossings variety, not a smooth toric manifold. A general strategy for constructing mirrors is to do mirror symmetry in families. Let $\mathcal X\to \Delta$ be a degeneration of Calabi--Yau manifolds whose central fiber $X_0$ is toric or toroidal and possibly singular. Then the strategy is: \begin{enumerate} \item find a toric or toroidal degeneration of the family to $X_0$; \item construct a mirror degeneration $\check X_0$ using the dual toric or affine-combinatorial data; \item deform or smooth $\check X_0$ to obtain the mirror family $\check{\mathcal X}$, and match the deformation parameters using the \underline{\href{https://jeffhicks.net/snippets/index.php?tag=def:mirrorMap}{ mirror map}}. \end{enumerate} There are several motivating reasons for taking this path: \begin{itemize} \item The SYZ proposal interprets mirror symmetry as fiberwise $T$-duality, which suggests looking at dual tori. \item Homological mirror symmetry suggests that a Lagrangian torus fiber equipped with a flat unitary local system should correspond to a skyscraper sheaf at a point of the mirror. Thus torus fibrations are natural objects to examine. \item The topological calculation below shows why dualizing torus fibers exchanges the two Hodge numbers. \end{itemize} \begin{definition}\cite{Mirror symmetry motivation notes} \label{def:specialLagrangianTorusFibration} Let $(X,\omega,\Omega)$ be a Calabi--Yau $n$-fold with its Ricci-flat K\"ahler metric, and assume that $\Omega$ is normalized with respect to this metric. For $\theta\in \RR/2\pi\ZZ$, an oriented real $n$-dimensional submanifold $L\subset X$ is \emph{special Lagrangian of phase $\theta$} if \[ \omega|_L=0,\qquad \operatorname{Im}(e^{-i\theta}\Omega)|_L=0, \] and \[ \operatorname{Re}(e^{-i\theta}\Omega)|_L=\operatorname{vol}_L \] as positive volume forms on $L$. A \emph{special Lagrangian torus fibration} of phase $\theta$ is a continuous map \[ f:X\to B \] to a real $n$-dimensional base such that, over a dense open subset $B_0\subset B$, the restriction \[ f^{-1}(B_0)\to B_0 \] is a smooth fiber bundle whose fibers are $n$-tori that are special Lagrangian submanifolds of phase $\theta$. In the SYZ setting, nontrivial compact examples are expected to have singular fibers over a discriminant locus $\Delta=B\setminus B_0$. \end{definition} \begin{definition}\cite{Mirror symmetry motivation notes} \label{def:dualTorusFibration} Let \[ f:X_0\to B_0 \] be a smooth torus fibration with fibers $F_b\simeq V_b/\Lambda_b$, where $V_b$ is a real vector space and $\Lambda_b\subset V_b$ is a lattice. The \emph{dual torus fibration} is \[ \check f:\check X_0\to B_0, \qquad \check F_b:=\check f^{-1}(b)=\operatorname{Hom}(\Lambda_b,U(1)) \simeq H^1(F_b;\RR)/H^1(F_b;\ZZ). \] Fiberwise, \[ H_1(\check F_b;\ZZ)\simeq H^1(F_b;\ZZ), \qquad H^1(\check F_b;\ZZ)\simeq H_1(F_b;\ZZ). \] If the three-torus fibers are oriented, then Poincar\'e duality, with respect to the chosen orientations, gives the useful identifications \[ H^1(\check F_b;\CC)\simeq H^2(F_b;\CC), \qquad H^2(\check F_b;\CC)\simeq H^1(F_b;\CC). \] These fiberwise identifications induce the corresponding dual local systems over $B_0$. \end{definition} Here is a motivating calculation from \cite{gross2001special}. It deliberately ignores many details about singular fibers, which are essential in the actual theory, but it captures the reason dual tori produce the mirror flip. Suppose that we have a special Lagrangian torus fibration \[ f:X\to B \] of a Calabi--Yau threefold. Assume, for this heuristic calculation, that the fibration is smooth, that the fibers are three-tori $F=f^{-1}(p)$, that $X$ has the Hodge diamond shape from \cref{art:hodgeDiamondAndDeformation}, and that the base $B$ is a closed oriented three-manifold with $H^1(B,\CC)=H^2(B,\CC)=0$. A globally smooth torus fibration with simply connected total space is not the actual situation for compact Calabi--Yau threefolds; singular fibers are necessary. The simplified model is still useful because it isolates the cohomological mechanism. Let \[ \mathcal H^q:=R^q f_*\CC \] denote the local system over $B$ whose fiber at $p$ is $H^q(F,\CC)$. The special Lagrangian condition gives an orientation of the fibers: after choosing the phase, $\operatorname{Re}\Omega$ restricts to a volume form on each fiber. Thus \[ \mathcal H^0\simeq \CC,\qquad \mathcal H^3\simeq \CC. \] The Leray--Serre spectral sequence has \[ E_2^{p,q}=H^p(B,\mathcal H^q)\Longrightarrow H^{p+q}(X,\CC). \] The $E_2$ page has the form \[ \begin{tikzcd}[scale=.5] H^0(B, \mathcal H^3) & H^1(B, \mathcal H^3) & H^2(B, \mathcal H^3) & H^3(B, \mathcal H^3)\\ H^0(B, \mathcal H^2) & H^1(B, \mathcal H^2) & H^2(B, \mathcal H^2) & H^3(B, \mathcal H^2) \\ H^0(B, \mathcal H^1) & H^1(B, \mathcal H^1) & H^2(B, \mathcal H^1) & H^3(B, \mathcal H^1) \\ H^0(B, \mathcal H^0) & H^1(B, \mathcal H^0)& H^2(B, \mathcal H^0) & H^3(B, \mathcal H^0). \end{tikzcd} \]Using $\mathcal H^0\simeq \mathcal H^3\simeq \CC$ and $H^1(B,\CC)=H^2(B,\CC)=0$, the top and bottom rows become \[ \begin{tikzcd}[scale=.5] \CC & 0& 0& \CC\\ H^0(B, \mathcal H^2) & H^1(B, \mathcal H^2) & H^2(B, \mathcal H^2) & H^3(B, \mathcal H^2) \\ H^0(B, \mathcal H^1) & H^1(B, \mathcal H^1) & H^2(B, \mathcal H^1) & H^3(B, \mathcal H^1) \\ \CC & 0& 0 & \CC. \end{tikzcd} \]Assume further, as part of this simplified model, that the spectral sequence degenerates at $E_2$ and that the relevant invariant-cycle terms vanish: \[ H^0(B,\mathcal H^1)=H^0(B,\mathcal H^2)=0. \] By duality, this also gives \[ H^3(B,\mathcal H^1)=H^3(B,\mathcal H^2)=0. \] Then the relevant part of the spectral sequence is \[ \begin{tikzcd}[scale=.5] \CC & 0& 0& \CC\\ 0 & H^1(B, \mathcal H^2) & H^2(B, \mathcal H^2) & 0 \\ 0 & H^1(B, \mathcal H^1) & H^2(B, \mathcal H^1) & 0 \\ \CC & 0& 0 & \CC. \end{tikzcd} \]Consequently, \[ H^2(X,\CC)\simeq H^1(B,\mathcal H^1), \] and \[ H^3(X,\CC)\simeq \CC\oplus H^1(B,\mathcal H^2)\oplus H^2(B,\mathcal H^1)\oplus \CC. \] Since $X$ is a Calabi--Yau threefold with $h^{2,0}=0$, we have \[ \dim H^2(X,\CC)=h^{1,1}(X),\qquad \dim H^3(X,\CC)=2h^{2,1}(X)+2. \] Moreover, Poincar\'e duality on the base with local coefficients, together with fiberwise duality, gives \[ \dim H^1(B,\mathcal H^2)=\dim H^2(B,\mathcal H^1). \] Therefore, \[ h^{1,1}(X)=\dim H^1(B,\mathcal H^1),\qquad h^{2,1}(X)=\dim H^1(B,\mathcal H^2). \] Now look at the dual torus fibration \[ \check f:\check X\to B. \] By \cref{def:dualTorusFibration}, fiberwise the dual torus satisfies \[ H^1(\check F,\CC)\simeq H_1(F,\CC)\simeq H^2(F,\CC), \] and similarly \[ H^2(\check F,\CC)\simeq H_2(F,\CC)\simeq H^1(F,\CC). \] Thus the local systems for the dual fibration are swapped: \[ \check{\mathcal H}^1\simeq \mathcal H^2, \qquad \check{\mathcal H}^2\simeq \mathcal H^1. \] Applying the same calculation to $\check X$ gives \[ h^{1,1}(\check X)=\dim H^1(B,\check{\mathcal H}^1) =\dim H^1(B,\mathcal H^2)=h^{2,1}(X), \] and \[ h^{2,1}(\check X)=\dim H^1(B,\check{\mathcal H}^2) =\dim H^1(B,\mathcal H^1)=h^{1,1}(X). \] This is the topological shadow of the mirror flip of Hodge numbers. \printbibliography \end{document}