\( \def\CC{{\mathbb C}} \def\RR{{\mathbb R}} \def\NN{{\mathbb N}} \def\ZZ{{\mathbb Z}} \def\QQ{{\mathbb Q}} \def\TT{{\mathbb T}} \def\CF{{\operatorname{CF}^\bullet}} \def\HF{{\operatorname{HF}^\bullet}} \def\SH{{\operatorname{SH}^\bullet}} \def\ot{{\leftarrow}} \def\st{\;:\;} \def\Fuk{{\operatorname{Fuk}}} \def\emprod{m} \def\cone{\operatorname{Cone}} \def\Flux{\operatorname{Flux}} \def\li{i} \def\ev{\operatorname{ev}} \def\id{\operatorname{id}} \def\grad{\operatorname{grad}} \def\ind{\operatorname{ind}} \def\weight{\operatorname{wt}} \def\Sym{\operatorname{Sym}} \def\HeF{\widehat{CHF}^\bullet} \def\HHeF{\widehat{HHF}^\bullet} \def\Spinc{\operatorname{Spin}^c} \def\min{\operatorname{min}} \def\div{\operatorname{div}} \def\SH{{\operatorname{SH}^\bullet}} \def\CF{{\operatorname{CF}^\bullet}} \def\Tw{{\operatorname{Tw}}} \def\Log{{\operatorname{Log}}} \def\TropB{{\operatorname{TropB}}} \def\wt{{\operatorname{wt}}} \def\Span{{\operatorname{span}}} \def\Crit{\operatorname{Crit}} \def\CritVal{\operatorname{CritVal}} \def\FS{\operatorname{FS}} \def\Sing{\operatorname{Sing}} \def\Coh{\operatorname{Coh}} \def\Vect{\operatorname{Vect}} \def\into{\hookrightarrow} \def\tensor{\otimes} \def\CP{\mathbb{CP}} \def\eps{\varepsilon} \)

Symplectic snippets

Fukaya-Seidel categories

This talk was given by Danil The main reference is [Sei01b, Sei01a]. Let \((X, \omega)\) be a \(2n\) dimensional symplectic manifold. Fix a compatible almost complex structure \(J\) on \(X\). [Novikov ring] The Novikov ring with \(\mathbb C\)-coefficients is the ring of formal sums \[\Lambda_{\geq 0}:= \left\{\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i T^{\lambda_i}\st a_i\in \CC, \lambda_i \in \RR_{\geq 0}, \lim_{i\to\infty} \lambda_i = \infty\right\}. \] See also: the Novikov Ring [Lagrangian Intersection Floer groups] Let \((X, \omega)\) be a symplectic manifold. Let \(L_0, L_1\subset (X, \omega)\) be Lagrangian submanifolds whose intersection in \(X\) is transverse. The Lagrangian intersection Floer complex is the vector space \[\CF(L_0, L_1):= \bigoplus_{p\in L_0\cap L_1} \Lambda \langle p\rangle \] equipped with an endomorphism \(\partial: \CF(L_0, L_1)\to \CF(L_0, L_1)\) whose structure coefficients are given by counts of pseudoholomorphic strips. For \(p,q\in L_0\cap L_1\) and \(\beta\in H_2(X, L_0\cup L_1, \ZZ)\), consider the moduli space of strips: \[\mathcal M(p, q, \beta):= \left\{u: \RR\times [0, 1]\to X \middle | \begin{array}{cc} u(s, t)\to p & \text{ as } s\to-\infty \\ u(s, t)\to q & \text{ as } s\to \infty \\ u(s, 0) \in L_0, u(s, 1)\in L_1 \\ [u]=\beta \end{array}\right. / \RR\] We work over \(\Lambda\) to ensure convergence of the differential. Under some extra assumptions, \((m^1)^2=0\), so we get some well-defined cohomology groups \(\HF(L_0, L_1)\), called the Lagrangian intersection Floer cohomology groups of \(L_0, L_1\). [Invariance of Lagrangian intersection Floer cohomology] Under appropriate conditions, the Lagrangian intersection Floer cohomology is independent of choices made in its definition and the Hamiltonian isotopy class of \(L_0\) or \(L_1\). [PSS isomorphism] Under hypotheses excluding obstruction and disk-bubbling phenomena, for example in the exact setting, \(\HF(L, L)\simeq H^\bullet(L, \Lambda)\). [Fukaya Category] The Fukaya category \(\Fuk(X)\) is an \(\Lambda\)-linear \(A_\infty\) category whose
  1. objects are suitably decorated Lagrangian submanifolds
  2. morphisms are generated by the Lagrangian Intersection Floer groups \(\CF(L_0, L_1 )\)
  3. compositions \(m^2\) are given by counts of pseudoholomorphic triangles.
We also have some higher maps \(m^k: \hom(L_{k-1}, L_k)\tensor \cdots \hom(L_0, L_1)\to \hom(L_0, L_k)[2-k]\) given by counting holomorphic \(k+1\)-gons. With extra assumptions on the symplectic manifold \(X\) and Lagrangians \(L\), we can equip \(\Fuk(X)\) with a \(\ZZ\)-grading.

definition 0.0.1

A Liouville domain is a pair \((X,\lambda)\), where
  • \(X\) is a \(2n\)-manifold with boundary \(\partial X\) and,
  • \(\lambda\in \Omega^1(X, \RR)\) is a one form on \(\Omega^1(X, \RR)\) so that \(\omega=d\lambda\) is a symplectic form for \(X\).
To this data we can associate a Liouville vector field \(Z\) defined by the property \(\iota_Z\omega= \lambda\). We require that this vector field transversely points outward along \(\partial X\). We call \(X\) a Liouville manifold if \(X\) is non-compact and obtained from a Liouville manifold \(X_0\) by attaching the \snap{symplectization of its contact boundary}{def:symplectization}

example 0.0.2

Let \(Q\) be a smooth \(n\)-dimensional manifold. We now describe a canonical symplectic form on the cotangent bundle, \(T^*Q\). At every point \(q\in Q\), there exists chart \(q\in U\subset Q\) which we can parameterize with coordinates \((q_1, \ldots, q_n)\). The cotangent bundle \(T^*U\) inherits coordinates \((q_1, p_1, q_2, p_2, \ldots, q_n, p_n)\), where the \(p_i\) linearly parameterize the fibers of the cotangent bundle in the direction of the basis element \(dq_i\). 1 In these coordinates, the canonical symplectic form on this chart is: \[\omega=\sum_{i=1}^n dp_i \wedge dq_i=d\left(\sum_{i=1}^n p_i\,dq_i\right).\]

example 0.0.3

Let \(Q\) be a manifold. The cotangent bundle \(X=T^*Q\) is an exact symplectic manifold; call the primitive \(\lambda_{can}=\sum_{i=1}^np_idq_i\). In local coordinates, the Liouville vector field is \(Z= \sum_{i=1}^n p_i \partial_{p_i}\). The flow of this vector field acts by scalar multiplication on the fibers of \(T^*Q\), \begin{align*}\phi^t: T^*Q\to T^*Q && (q, p) \mapsto (q, e^t p)\end{align*} which inflates the symplectic form. Now equip \(Q\) with a metric \(g\). The metric determines a unit sphere bundle \(S^*Q\subset T^*Q\), which is transverse to \(Z\). Letting \(\alpha=\lambda|_{S^*Q}\) makes \((S^*Q, \alpha)\) a contact manifold. The time \(t\)-flow on \((S^*Q, \alpha)\) corresponds to the time \(t\) geodesic flow on the base ((geodesics and symplectic cohohomology of the cotangent bundle)). It is known ([Fet52]) that every closed manifold has at least 1 closed geodesic, so all of these examples of contact manifolds have a Reeb orbit.

definition 0.0.4

Let \(X\) be a Liouville manifold. The wrapped Fukaya category \(\mathcal W(X)\) is an \(A_\infty\) category whose objects are exact, properly embedded Lagrangian submanifolds which are cylindrical at infinity, together with the usual brane data. Its morphism spaces are wrapped Floer complexes \[ CW^\bullet(L_0,L_1):=\varinjlim_H CF^\bullet(L_0,\phi_H^1(L_1)), \] where the limit is taken over admissible Hamiltonians which wrap at infinity. The higher products are defined by counts of inhomogeneous pseudoholomorphic polygons.
[Wrapped Floer cohomology in cotangent bundle of the circle] To compute the wrapped Floer cohomology of \(L:=T^*_0S^1\subset T^*S^1\) with itself, we first wrap the Lagrangian submanifold with the Hamiltonian \(p^2: T^*S^1\to \RR\). This gives the red ``spiral'', \(L^w\) drawn in the picture below. The intersections between \(L, L^w\) are in bijection with the integers. After fixing an intersection point \((`` e'')\), we (suggestively) identify the Lagrangian intersection Floer cochains with the Laurent polynomial algebra. \(\Hom(L, L)\simeq \CC[x, x^{-1}]\).
Floer theory of zero section in \(T^*S^1\)
figure 0.0.5:Computation of the wrapped Floer cohomology of the cotangent fiber with itself in \(T^*S^1\).
In fact, this identification sends the Floer theoretic product (given by counts of holomorphic polygons) to the product structure on \(\CC[x, x^{-1}]\). This provides us with a method for understanding the Fukaya category of a non-compact manifold; we will additionally want to incorporate the data of a potential so that we can study the Fukaya category of a symplectic Landau-Ginzberg model. [exact symplectic fibration] Let \(B\) be a symplectic manifold with boundary; for example \((B=D^2\subset \CC)\). An exact symplectic fibration is a smooth proper fiber bundle \(\pi: E\to B\) such that:
  • \(E\) is a manifold with codimension two corners, and a decomposition of the boundary into a vertical and horizontal component \(\partial E= \partial_h E\cup \partial_v E\);
  • We have differential forms \(\omega\in \Omega^2(E), \theta\in \Omega^1(E)\) such that \(E_z=\pi^{-1}(z)\) is a Liouville domain with symplectic form \(\omega_z=\omega|_{E_z}\) and primitive \(\theta_z=\theta|_{E_z}\);
  • The fibration \(\pi\) is ``trivial'' near the horizontal boundary.
[exact Landau-Ginzberg model] An exact LG model is an exact symplectic manifold \((E, \omega=d\theta)\) that carries a proper smooth map \(\pi: E\to D^2\) with a compatible almost complex structure \(J\) making \(\pi\) holomorphic. Furthermore, we require the locus of critical points \(\Crit(\pi)\) to be disjoint from \(\partial_h E\) and \(\pi\) is an exact symplectic fibration away from \(\Crit(\pi)\). [Lefschetz fibration] We will call a exact LG model \((E, \pi)\) a Lefschetz fibration if \(\Crit(\pi)\) is a finite set of points, every fiber has at most one critical point, and \(\pi\) is ``Morse'' in the sense that it is locally modelled on the fibration \(\pi(z_1, \ldots, z_n)= z_1^2+\cdots + z_n^2\). [my first Lefschetz fibration] Let \(B=D^2\subset \CC\), let \(E=\left\{ z\in \CC^n \st \left|\sum_{i=1}^n z_i^2\right|\leq 1, \|z\|\leq T\right\}\) for some \(T>1\), then we have a Lefschetz fibration \begin{align*} \pi: E\to &B\\ z\mapsto & z_1^2+\cdots + z_n^2 \end{align*} [a non-Lefschetz fibration] Consider the map \begin{align*} \CC^3\to & \CC\\ (x, y, z) \mapsto & xyz. \end{align*} This is an example mirror to the pair-of-pants. [Lefschetz fibration from a pencil] Given a smooth projective variety \(X\) and an ample line bundle \(L\to X\), choose a Lefschetz pencil generated by sections \(\sigma_0, \sigma_1\in H^0(L)\). From the data of a Lefschetz pencil we can define an exact Lefschetz fibration \[E:=X\setminus Y_\infty, \pi(x)=\frac{\sigma_0(x)}{\sigma_1(x)}\] where \(Y_t=\{x\in X \st \sigma_0(x)/\sigma_1(x)=t\}\), Then \(\pi: E\to \CC\) is a Lefschetz fibration. The Lagrangian intersection Floer cohomology of a pair of Lagrangian thimbles \(L_i, L_j\) in a Lefschetz fibration, can be computed in the fiber as \[\hom_{\FS(Y, W)}(L_i, L_j)= \left\{\begin{array}{cc}\hom_{\Fuk(Y_t)}(V_i, V_j) & \text{ if } i<j \\ \CC\cdot x_i & \text{ if } i=j\\ 0 & \text{ if } i>j \end{array}\right. \] The ordered Lagrangian thimbles associated to a distinguished basis of vanishing paths form a full exceptional collection in the directed Fukaya-Seidel category. Here, fix a Lefschetz fibration \(W: Y\to \CC\) with critical values \(\lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_k\in \CC\). Pick a collection of vanishing paths for the \(\lambda_j\). This gives us Lagrangian thimbles \(L_1, \cdots, L_k\), and vanishing cycles \(V_1, \ldots, V_k\) (which are Lagrangians inside some fixed fiber \(W^{-1}(t)\), where \(t\gg 0\)). We now have a full exceptional collection. We can modify a set of vanishing paths by ``twisting'' them in the base of the Lefschetz fibration.
mutation of vanishing paths
figure 0.0.6:we can mutate vanishing cycles in the base of an LG fibration
@inproceedings{seidel2001vanishing, title={Vanishing cycles and mutation}, author={Seidel, Paul}, booktitle={European Congress of Mathematics: Barcelona, July 10--14, 2000 Volume II}, pages={65--85}, year={2001}, organization={Springer} } @article{seidel2001more, title={More about vanishing cycles and mutation}, author={Seidel, Paul}, journal={Symplectic geometry and mirror symmetry (Seoul, 2000)}, pages={429--465}, year={2001} }

Connections

Uses

Used in

No direct links found.

References

[Fet52]Abram Il'ich Fet. Variational problems on closed manifolds. Matematicheskii Sbornik, 72(2):271--316, 1952.
[Sei01a]Paul Seidel. More about vanishing cycles and mutation. Symplectic Geometry and Mirror Symmetry (Seoul, 2000), pages 429--465, 2001.
[Sei01b]Paul Seidel. Vanishing cycles and mutation. In European Congress of Mathematics: Barcelona, July 10--14, 2000 Volume II, pages 65--85. Springer, 2001.